
VOTE ONLY YOUR BLUE PROXY OR
BLUE VIF TODAY
REGISTERED SHAREHOLDERS
(YOU HOLD A SHARE CERTIFICATE REGISTERED IN YOUR NAME)
VOTING BY INTERNET
Go to www.voteproxyonline.com specified on your BLUE proxy and then follow the voting instructions on the screen. You will required a 12-digit Control Number (located on the front of your BLUE proxy) to identify yourself to the system.
VOTING BY FAX
Complete, sign and date your BLUE form of proxy and return it by fax to 1.416.595.9593. On the fax please write: To the Toronto Office of TSX Trust (Proxy Department)
VOTING BY MAIL OR DELIVERY
Complete, date and sign your BLUE form of proxy and return it to:
TSX TRUST Company
Attention: Proxy Department
301-100 Adelaide Street
West, Toronto, ON M5H4H1
CANADIAN NON-REGISTERED (BENEFICIAL) SHAREHOLDERS
(YOU HOLD SHARES THROUGH A CANADIAN BANK, BROKER OR OTHER INTERMEDIARY)
VOTING BY INTERNET
Go to www.proxyvote.com specified on your BLUE VIF and then follow the voting instructions on the screen. You will required a 16-digit Control Number (located on the front of your BLUE VIF) to identify yourself to the system.
VOTING BY FAX
Complete, sign and date your BLUE VIF and return it by fax to 905.507.7793 OR 514.281.8911.
VOTING BY MAIL OR DELIVERY
Complete, sign and date your BLUE VIF and return it in the postage prepaid envelope provided to the address set out on the envelope.
VOTING BY PHONE
Shareholders who wish to vote by phone should call 1.800.474.7493 (English) or 1.800.474.7501 (French). You will require a 16-digit Control Number (located on the front of your BLUE VIF) to identify yourself to the system.
UNITED STATES NON-REGISTERED (BENEFICIAL) SHAREHOLDERS
(YOU HOLD SHARES THROUGH A U.S. BANK, BROKER OR OTHER INTERMEDIARY)
VOTING BY INTERNET
Go to www.proxyvote.com specified on your BLUE VIF and then follow the voting instructions on the screen. You will required a Control Number (located on the front of your BLUE VIF/proxy) to identify yourself to the system.
VOTING BY FAX
Complete, sign and date your BLUE VIF/proxy and return it by fax to the fax number(s) listed on your BLUE VIF/proxy.
VOTING BY MAIL OR DELIVERY
Complete, sign and date your BLUE VIF/proxy and return it in the postage prepaid envelope provided to the address set out on the envelope.
VOTING BY PHONE
Shareholders who wish to vote by phone should call 1.800.454.8683 then follow voting instructions on your BLUE VIF/proxy. You will require a Control Number (located on the front of your BLUE VIF/proxy) to identify yourself to the system.
OUR RECOMMENDED BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Anthony Milewski
Executive Chairman
Justin Cochrane
President
Philip Williams
Director
Lance Frericks
Director
Maurice Swan
Director
CHOOSE
The board recommended by Nickel 28, an experienced Board with a clear plan and commitment to ensuring the success of Nickel 28 while maintaining its position for future growth and maximizing Shareholder value.
REASONS TO VOTE FOR AND SUPPORT NICKEL 28’S RECOMMENDED DIRECTOR NOMINEES
01
Nickel 28 is on the Brink of a Transformational Inflection Point
02
Nickel 28 Needs Active and Engaged Management
03
Solid Share Price Performance
04
Aligned with Fellow Shareholders
05
The Board is Protecting Shareholders and Attempted to Avoid a Proxy Fight
06
Strong Existing Board
07
Long-term Plan to Drive Value
Pelham’s Director Nominations Are Invalid Confirms Supreme Court Of British Columbia
The Board reminds shareholders to remain vigilant against Pelham’s repeated attempts to take control of the Company. The Supreme Court of British Columbia has confirmed that the purported advance notice of Pelham Investment Partners LP (“Pelham”), to nominate directors for election at Nickel 28 Annual General Meeting, did not comply with the advance notice provisions in the Company’s articles.
Accordingly, Pelham’s purported nomination of directors will not be considered at the Meeting. The Court also awarded Nickel 28 and Mr. Maurice Swan (independent Nickel 28 Director) their costs of the proceeding against Pelham.
At the same time, the Court also dismissed a petition by Pelham seeking, among other things, an order waiving Pelham’s non-compliance with the Advance Notice Provisions, and the appointment of an independent chair of the Meeting. The Court also ordered Pelham to pay to Nickel 28 costs of Pelham’s proceeding.
In seeking relief from the Court, and in opposing Mr. Swan’s petition, Pelham offered no explanation other than inadvertence for its failure to comply with the Advance Notice Provisions. Pelham’s failure was consistent with its conduct throughout the course of its pursuit of Nickel 28, in which Pelham has acted without regard for rules that apply to all of the Company’s shareholders.
